 |
The
project manager's perspective
Based on the interviews conducted
by DfES consultants,the
project managers generally recommended
the following:
- Recognise that the project is
innovative
- Secure revenue funding in support
of capital
- Follow the financial procedures
of the 'accountable body'
- Be realistic in scaling ambitions
and writing delivery plans
- Achieving equipment roll-out,
training participants and developing
a community portal is task enough
Good practice recommendations for
'new start' WuC projects were as follows:
Back to Top
Advice
to funders
The advice that project managers
would give to funders, in particular
the DfES on meeting its programme
objectives was:
- Do not provide funding profiled
to financial years - if the programme
over-runs, the project is under
pressure to spend the funding allocated
by a firm deadline (and not according
to the its delivery plan)
- Provide an element of revenue
funding in support of large capital
funded projects - otherwise, the
WuC project is delayed while revenue
funding is sought, confirmed and
drawn-down
- Recognise that the project impacts
hard on the host organisation/accountable
body in terms of staff time &
resources
- Narrowband technology solutions
limit the project from the outset:
- reduced scope for the delivery
of rich media content
- less incentive for community
content development
- higher online costs to the
end user
- DfES 'moving targets' - employment
& training, social inclusion,
community regeneration hinder planning
- DfES needs to adopt a wider vision
and use a WuC not for local 'synergy
links' but 'joined-up government'
Back to Top
|
 |